Perceptions of intensive nursing regarding prone maneuvers after the pandemic: study with focus groups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60108/ce.376Keywords:
prone position, critical care nursing, qualitative research, focus groupsAbstract
Introduction: During the SARS-COV2 pandemic, prone maneuvers were common in intensive care units (ICUs). The exponential increase in Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) meant a greater need for pronation in seriously ill patients and, consequently, the need to implement protocolized guidelines encouraged by the need to adapt to the rapid pace of change in patient care and improvement. of the procedure.
Objective: To analyze the perception of nursing professionals about how they perceive performing the prone maneuver after the implementation of the new protocols, after the pandemic.
Methodology: Qualitative-phenomenological study carried out between July and September 2023 in an ICU, through intentional sampling, of a tertiary hospital. Data collected through focus groups of 5 participants (segmented by level of experience); They were subjected to a thematic-reflexive analysis (according to the Braun & Clarke strategy) after digital recording, transcription and subsequent coding.
Results: Emerging themes were: 1) the importance of an experienced team; 2) the complexity of the technique and aftercare; 3) greater safety in practice after the pandemic and 4) discomfort among professionals due to the lack of clinical practice.
Conclusions: The perceptions of professionals after the pandemic allow us to respond to the needs required by the personnel involved on the front line and learn from the mistakes made to improve patient safety and shorten the high learning curve of the technique.
References
1. Velavan TP, Meyer CG. The covid-19 epidemic. Trop Med Int Health. 2020;25(3):278-80. .» https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13383
2. Sweeney RM, McAuley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 2016;388(10058):2416-30. » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00578-X
3. Confalonieri M, Salton F, Fabiano F. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26(144):160116. » https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0116-2016
4. Papazian L, Aubron C, Brochard L, Chiche JD, Combes A, Dreyfuss D, et al. Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(69):1-18. » https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0540-9
5. Roche Ocampo F, Auirre-Bermeo H, Jordi Mancebo. Prone positioning in acute distress syndrome ARDS When and how?. Medicina Intensiva 2011;40:585-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2011.03.019
6. Rafool S, Goulet K, Esan A, Hess DR. Sessler C.N. Severe hypoxemic respiratory failure: part 2—nonventilatory strategies. Chest.2010;137(6): 1437-1448. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2416
7. Bonet R, Moliné A. Protocolo de colocación del paciente con Síndrome de Distrés Respiratorio Agudo en decúbito prono. Nure Inv. 2009; 6(40). Disponible en: https://www.nureinvestigacion.es/OJS/index.php/nure/article/view/398/389
8. Campello V, Vidal C, Del Saz A, Villaescusa A, Carolina M. La terapia decúbito prono desde la perspectiva de la enfermera de UCI: una revisión integrativa. Enferm Cientif. 2015;10:1-16 Disponible en: https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/47904/1/RECIEN_10_03.pdf
9. Mancebo J. A multicenter trial of prolonged prone ventilation in severe acude respiratory distress syndrome. Critical care med.2006; 173: 1233-1239 https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200503-353OC
10. L. Blanch, J.Mancebo, Short-term effects of prone position in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med (1997) 23: 1033±1039 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050453
11. Accoce M, Plotnikow G, Setten M, Villalba D, Galindez P. Decúbito prono:revisión narrativa. Rev SATI. 2017;34(1):1-23. Disponible en: http://revista.sati.org.ar/index.php/MI/article/view/458/407
12. Bertoia N, Buchanan P, Las Heras M, Bisso I, Mancilla J. Protocolo para la Estandarización de los Cuidados de Enfermería en el Paciente decúbito prono. 2019. Disponible en: https://www.fcchi.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Protocolo-Cuidados-de-enfermer%C3%ADa-en-el-Dec%C3%BAbito-Prono.pdf
13. Munshi L, Sorbo LD, Adhikari NKJ, Hodgson CL, Wunsch H, Meade MO, et al. Prone position for acute respiratory distress syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(suppl 4):S280-S288. » https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-343OT
14. Koulouras V, Papathanakos G, Papathanasiou A, Nakos, G. Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A pathophysiology-based review. World journal of critical care medicine. 2016;5(2): 121–136. https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.121
15. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al.; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 2016;315:788–800. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0291
16. Qadir N, Bartz RR, Cooter ML, Hough CL, Lanspa MJ, Banner-Goodspeed VM, et al.; Severe ARDS: Generating Evidence (SAGE) Study Investigators; Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Discovery Network. Variation in early management practices in moderate-to-severe ARDS in the United States: the Severe ARDS: Generating Evidence Study. Chest 2021;160:1304–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.047
17. Botta M, Tsonas AM, Pillay J, Boers LS, Algera AG, Bos LDJ, et al.; PRoVENT-COVID Collaborative Group. Ventilation management and clinical outcomes in invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 (PRoVENT-COVID): a national, multicentre, observational cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2021;9:139–148 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30459-8
18. Le Terrier C, Sigaud F, Lebbah S, Desmedt L, Hajage D, Guérin C, et al.; COVID-ICU Group on behalf of the REVA Network and the COVID-ICU Investigators. Early prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome related to COVID-19: a propensity score analysis from the multicentric cohort COVID-ICU network-the ProneCOVID study. Crit Care 2022;26:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03949-7
19. Hidalgo I, Rebollo M, Maceiras B, Barriga M, Giró E, García L et al. Decúbito prono: una técnica para mejorar la hipoxemia del síndrome de distrés respiratorio agudo. Metas de Enfermería. 2014;17(9):11-4. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/ibc-131509
20. Do Prado M, Souza M, Monticelli M, Cometto M, Gomez P. Investigacion cualitativa en enfermería. Metodología y didáctica. Washintong D.C; 2013. Disponible en: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/51587/9789275318171_spa.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
21. Estenssoro E, Dubin A. Síndrome de distrés respiratorio agudo. Medicina (B. Aires). 2016; 76(4):235-241. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0025-76802016000400008&lng=es.
22. Campello V, Vidal C, Del Saz A, Villaescusa A, Carolina M. La terapia decúbito prono desde la perspectiva de la enfermera de UCI: una revisión integrativa. Enferm Cientif. 2015;10:1-16 Disponible en: https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/47904/1/RECIEN_10_03.pdf12.
23. Vollman K. Implementing Prone Positioning in Your Unit: What Do You Need to Know?. Connect: The World of Critical Care Nursing. 2021;14(3):130-140.Doi:10.1891/WFCCN-D-20-00027
24. Sperling, D. Dilemas éticos, riesgo percibido y motivación entre enfermeras durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Etica de la enfermería.2021; 28(1): 9-22. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020956376
25. Bradbury‐Jones C, Sambrook S, Irvine F.. The phenomenological focus group: an oxymoron?. Journal of advanced nursing. 2009; 65(3): 663-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04922.x
26. Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299—302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
27. Flick U. Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata; 2018
28. REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA: Diccionario de la lengua española, 23.ª ed., [versión 23.7 en línea]. <https://dle.rae.es> [10/03/2024]
29. De Antoni C, Martins C, Ferronato MA, Simões A, Maurente V, Costa F et al. Grupo focal: método qualitativo de pesquisa com adolescentes em situação de risco. Arq. bras. psicol. 2001; 53(2): 38-53. Disponible en https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-319160
30. Debus M. Manual para excelência em la investigacion mediante grupos focales. Washington: Academy for Educational Development; 1997.Disponible en https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/pah-24739
31. Roso A. Grupos focais em Psicologia Social: da teoria à prática. Psico 1997; 28(2): 155-69
32. Meier MJ, Kudlowiez S. Grupo focal: uma experiência singular. Texto & Contexto Enf. 2003; 12(3): 394-9. Disponible en https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/bde-14417
33. Casey MA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.London: Sage Publications; 2000
34. Braun V, Clarke, V. Thematic analysis revised. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.2019; 53(9): 1689–1699
35. Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. The European Journal of General Practice.2018; 24(1): 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
36. Jiménez-De Gracia L, Ruiz-Moral R, Gavilán-Moral E, et al. Opiniones de los médicos de familia acerca de la implicación de los pacientes en la toma de decisiones: un estudio con grupos focales. Atención Primaria.2012; 44(7): 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2011.07.007
37. Aguilar ÁR, Domínguez PL. Cuidados al paciente COVID en una unidad de cuidados intensivos. Enfermería Docente. 2021;(113): 56-61.
38. Righi NC, Plentz RDM, De Marchi PTR, Brambatti KR, et al. Perception of health professionals on the prone position as a therapeutic strategy for patients with COVID-19. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa.2022;29;176-180. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/21021229022022EN
39. McCormick J, Blackwood B. (). Nursing the ARDS patient in the prone position: the experience of qualified ICU nurses. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 2001; 17(6): 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1054/iccn.2001.1611
40. Estalella GM, Zabalegui A Guerra SS. Gestión y liderazgo de los servicios de Enfermería en el plan de emergencia de la pandemia COVID-19: la experiencia del Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Enfermería Clínica.2021; 31: S12-S17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.05.002
41. Montaguano JAV, Jiménez EIA, Flores APP. (2021). Percepción del profesional de enfermería sobre los cuidados aplicados al paciente en posición de decúbito prono asociado al COVID-19. Enfermería Investig.2021; 6(2): 36-42. https://doi.org/10.31243/ei.uta.v6i2.986.2021
42. Valencia NC, Hurtado-Chávez MF, Ríos-Hernández MJ, Ramirez-Fortanell OY Díaz-Ordoñez M. Nivel de conocimiento de enfermería sobre pronación en síndrome de distrés respiratorio agudo en un hospital de segundo nivel de San Juan del Río, Querétaro. Lux Médica.2023; 18(53). https://doi.org/10.33064/53lm20234095
43. Salciute-Simene E. Manual proning of a morbidly obese COVID-19 patient: A case report. Australian Critical Care.2022; 35(1): 102-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2021.10.002
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
En caso de que el artículo sea publicado, los autores aceptan transferir todos los derechos del trabajo presentado, incluidos los derechos de autor y aquellos relativos a la transmisión electrónica, exclusivamente a CODEM, de manera universal, en todos los idiomas, una vez que el trabajo haya sido aceptado para su publicación dentro de la revista electrónica CONOCIMIENTO ENFERMERO.
El autor podrá hacer copias ilimitadas del trabajo para uso docente, reutilizarlo en su totalidad o parcialmente en un libro escrito por el autor o hacer copias para su distribución en la institución en la que trabaja. CODEM hará mención al nombre del autor en las publicaciones que se realicen del trabajo.
